Thursday, November 26, 2009

FOR THERE IS MUCH WORK TO BE DONE

"He said, 'Master, you gave me five talents. See, I have made five more.' His master said to him, 'Well done, my good and faithful servant. Since you were faithful in small matters, I will give you great responsibilities. Come, share your master's joy.'" [Matthew 25:20-21]

"...[B]ut rather labor, doing honest work with his own hands, so that he may have something to share with one in need...[And] be kind to one another, compassionate, forgiving one another as God has forgiven you in Christ." [Ephesians 4:28, 32]

***

What if we could invest in Americans, reduce waste, increase GDP, and improve family morale with a philosophical shift in the administration of taxpayer funded unemployment benefits? Would Congress have the courage to take action?

The recent extension of unemployment benefits is but another chapter in an economic saga for which the end has yet to be written.  Among the unemployed are many skilled and talented job seekers eager to return to gainful employment. The economic meltdown's domino effect has led many breadwinners to lose their previously "secure" positions, despite dedicated their dedicated service to their former employer, coupled with specialized technical training and/or post-graduate education.

As the unanimous Senate vote and earlier overwhelmingly bipartisan 331-83 House of Representatives vote suggest, no God-loving person would want to see their neighbor's family starve or lose their home simply as a collateral result of a layoff.  Yet I would put forth that there would be a more effective manner in which these taxpayer dollars could be transferred from the federal coffers to the family budgets.

If one were to agree that a majority of unemployed men and women possess the strong American work ethic and derive dignity and self-esteem from actively engaging in productive and creative work, then might there be a better manner to pay out these taxpayer-funded benefits?


  • Among the unemployed are skilled architects, engineers, and building trades. Are there not schools, government buildings, hospitals, and housing projects in needs of expansion, maintenance, or repair?


  • Among the unemployed are skilled technology professionals. Are there not public schools, state universities, government agencies, hospitals, and the military in need of networking & cabling, software design & programming, data mining, and hardware deployment?


  • Among the unemployed are skilled teachers, counselors, and administrators. Are there not at-risk children (pre-K through high school) who could benefit from the caring, compassionate attention that additional educators and specialists could bring to challenged & underfunded public school systems?


  • ...and so forth...

I think we would be hard pressed to find able-bodied Americans who wouldn't trade the hours of stress, loneliness, and uncertainty for the engagement of familiar or new meaningful contribution to the economy. So long as we've made the decision, through our Legislative and Executive Branches to spend taxpayer funds to support families through a prolonged period of unemployment, can't we at least structure such a program to produce a return on our investment instead of simply a government-funded benefit?

TODAY'S QUESTION: How can Congress restructure future unemployment compensation legislation to produce the greatest return to our nation on the meaningful and necessary investment of taxpayer funds?

2 comments:

  1. Since Twitter does not lend itself to the exchange of meaningful content, I'm taking the time to post a few thoughts here.

    While your points are valid that there are millions of Americans crying out to get back to work and a Congress that is Hell bent on making sure that they don't; unless if course they work for the gov't or unions - the hard cold fact of the global economy is that no one is buying, no one is building, no one is hiring and no one can borrow to do those things.

    In the past two weeks we've seen evidence that national currencies (including our own) are at risk of total collapse. FDIC is in the red with more bank failures as sure as the sunrise. FHA is going to make Freddie and Fannie look like sunshine and lollipops when it blows up (any day now) and the debt announcement from Dubai sent shockwaves around the fiscal world warning of what it to come.

    It is quite difficult to not see these and other related incidents occurring and not arrive at the conclusion that we are staring a global meltdown in the face with a new global economic system and gov't to replace it. Sure, a year ago - maybe even still today, that sounds completely crazy, but when you step back and look at the big picture, it's hard to see anything else.

    Why anyone that doesn't have 0 debt and/or a massive liquid asset pool to draw on from this impending crash would invest in anything with risk associated with it is simply inconceivable.

    There will be a reset. From it's ashes will be a new global reserve currency and the means of daily transactional exchange will be global credits (based on nothing) that are tracked and taxed.

    That's my opinion; that's my prediction and I'm sticking to it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jamie, I appreciate you insights on this matter. Cris

    ReplyDelete